Alien highway "Missouri Mayhem" 6.2 out of 10 stars Time to Read: 2 min More questions needed answers...

More questions needed answers...

Alien highway "Missouri Mayhem" 6.2 out of 10 stars 

Time to Read: 2 min

BASIC PLOT: 

The team is investigating a new spate of UFO encounters over Missouri. They are in the same general area of the 1973 UFO flap over Piedmont.

INTERESTING QUESTIONS THAT WEREN'T FOLLOWED UP ON: 

*Why did the authorities discourage/threaten witnesses in the original UFO flap over Piedmont, Missouri?

*A hunter, with many years of experience, thinks the deer aren't right - that they might be some kind of artificial sentry, or hologram.

*While investigating a strange circle, allegedly where a UFO landed, cameras and other equipment go down with some kind of interference. The soil testing of the dirt within the strange ring proves to be hydrophobic.

Missouri ring

*The team is surveiled by two people in a white van (govt?) who run when Daniel Zukowski confronts them.

INFORMATION ON THE QUESTIONS THAT WEREN'T ADDRESSED: 

*THE HUNTER SAYING THE DEER WERE STRANGE, definitely should have been followed up on. It is reminiscent of questions asked in the David Paulides film, Missing 411: The U.F.O. Connection (2022). In that informative movie, Paulides has many accounts of UFOs being interested in the deer/elk populations, and their current destruction, by a disease very reminiscent of Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (Mad Cow Disese).

*THE HYDROPHOBIC DIRT IS VERY REMINISCENT OF THE 1971 DELPHOS, KANSAS CASE   The Johnson family had a sheep farm in Delphos, Kansas in 1971. Ronnie Johnson, was out tending the sheep with his dog, when a mushroom shaped UFO hovered over the ground. It left a glowing ring (just like in the Zukowski Missouri case), and when touched, caused ill effects. The soil was also tested in the Delphos case, and was found to be hydrophobic, (just like in the Missouri case), but the team didn't expand on this further. I was very interested in any other similarities, such as missing time (Ronnie Johnson lost around 30 minutes of time, did the Missouri family have anything similar?) and other elements, like fungus, found in the soil. To read more about the Delphos Case, click here.

*WHY DIDN'T DANIEL TRY HARDER TO GET THE LICENSE PLATE OF THE VAN WHO WAS SURVEILING THEM? He's a cop, it would have been interesting to know who was following them.

Who was in the white van?

WHAT WORKS: 

*BRAVERY & DEDICATION OF THE TEAM Chuck Zukowski is steadfast in his belief that something is out there. He approaches things from a scientific perspective, and by adding Daniel Zukowski, his son, a committed skeptic to the team, he also adds dissenting voices. His credibility is above reproach, having sacrificed a job he loved in law enforcement, to pursue this passion.

WHAT DOESN'T WORK: 

*HEATHER TADDY DOESN'T BELONG ON THIS SHOW Heather Taddy was on a bs show (Paranormal State (2007)) a million years ago. She has NOTHING to do with UFO research, and as far as I can tell, all she's doing on this show, is adding a semi-familiar face. She brings nothing else (in terms of experience).

TO RECOMMEND, OR NOT TO RECOMMEND, THAT IS THE QUESTION: 

*I would definitely recommend this show to people who are interested in the UFO/UAP phenomenon. It asks many of the right questions, but due to time restraints, and the current greed in the edu-tainment industry, many of the interesting questions proposed by the show, aren't followed up on. It leaves an air of unfinished business, and an incomplete feeling to the show. This is NOT the fault of the team, or the production. It is the fault of a society that has allowed an "hour" long TV show, to be whittled down to 41 minutes, and who have allowed corporate fat cats to have jets, so the rest of us can have crappy "entertainment". Your welcome.

CLOSING NOTES: 

*THIS IS A LOW BUDGET TELEVISION SHOW, please keep that in mind before you watch/rate it. Low budget documentary TV shows have a much lower budget than regular TV shows, so your expectations should be adjusted.

*I HAVE NO CONNECTION TO THE SHOW, or production in ANY way. This review was NOT written in full, or in part, by a bot. I am just an honest viewer, who wishes for more straight forward reviews (less trolls and fanboys), and better entertainment. Hope I helped you out.