FRAMED FOR MURDER (TV movie 2007) 3 out of 10 stars Time to Read: 2:20 min

 Weak story, bad acting and lots of plotholes...

FRAMED FOR MURDER (TV movie 2007) 3 out of 10 stars Time to Read: 2:20 min

BASIC PLOT: 

June, a weak, mentally unstable woman is framed for her abusive husband's murder. Rather than fight the charges, she accepts a plea deal, and serves eight years for manslaughter. Her sister Claire (Susan Walters) takes custody of June's son, with her husband, Jason (Perry King).

June emerges from prison a changed woman. Determined to get her life back, and prove her innocence, not just for herself, but for her son as well, she begins a targeted campaign against her husband's killer. She enlists the help of her former cellmate, Charlie (Claire Brosseau), and Charlie's brother, Victor (Jonathan Higgins). They seek the help of PI, Diane Desalvo (Lisa Langlois), an old family friend. But their fact-finding mission has drawn unwanted attention from the real killer, and one of them won't survive.

Will June learn the truth about why she was framed? Will she ever be able to clear her name, and be reunited with her son? Or will she meet the same grizzly end as her ill-fated husband?

WHAT WORKS: 

*THE MOVIE IS SHOT WELL Douglas Jackson never phones in his movies. This is directed, and shot well thanks to Jackson, and his cinematographer, Bert Tougas.

WHAT DOESN'T WORK: 

*THE POLICE TELL JUNE, THERE ARE NO BRUISES ON HER PERSON, BUT HER CLOTHES ARE RIPPED, AND THERE ARE SIGNS OF A STRUGGLE Police know, especially by 2007, that some abusers are keen not to leave evidence, like black eyes, or broken bones, on abused women. We never see her Mirandized BEFORE she's questioned, either. They never ask questions, like -Who called the police to the house? There's a lot of information that's just brushed over, so she takes the plea deal, and goes to prison for eight years. That's sloppy writing by Christine Conradt & Richard Dana Smith.

*WE NEVER GET THE BACKSTORY ON EVIL SISTER, CLAIRE, & THE BLONDE GARDNER, NICK How do Claire (Susan Walters) and Nick (Kevin Jubinville) get together? How does their affair begin? What's his involvement? Why is he willing to kill for Claire? These are questions we SHOULD have answered by the time the movie is 2/3rds over, but again, they are just brushed over.

*THIS FEELS LIKE CHRISTINE CONRADT REWORKED ONE OF HER PREVIOUS, MORE SUCCESSFUL SCRIPTS and came up with nothing! This movie has many of the same plotlines as The Perfect Marriage (2006), but not done as successfully. The filmmakers even use a redhead for the main character (just like in The Perfect Marriage (2006)). It was a fine made-for-tv melodrama, this is not.

*PACING IS OFF By the 1:15 mark, I'm thinking of fast forwarding through, because nothing is happening. I should say, the same stuff is happening that happened 30 min ago, the same fights, the same break-downs, THE SAME!

*CHARACTERS ARE TOO ONE DIMENSIONAL I know this is a melodrama, BUT, you have to have more story if I'm supposed to engage with the movie. The story is flat & repetitive, and there's not enough character development/backstory for me to care about any of these people. Not one of Christine Conradt better scripts.

*THE SON, IS AN AFTERTHOUGHT Neither Claire, or June, seem to have much feeling, or thoughts for him. Claire had been raising him for the last eight years, but remarks they'll find a good home for him, like he's an unwanted puppy. He is June's biological son, yet she seems not to care, and therefore it feels tacked on, and not needed.

TO RECOMMEND, OR NOT TO RECOMMEND, THAT IS THE QUESTION: 

*I can't recommend this movie. It is a bad redo of The Perfect Marriage (2006), and even though that has a few problems, it's a fun time waster. This is not fun, and is instead just a waste of your time.

CLOSING NOTES: 

*THIS IS A MADE-FOR-TV MOVIE, please keep that in mind before you watch/rate it. TV movies have a much lower budget, and so your expectations should be adjusted.

*I HAVE NO CONNECTION TO THE FILM, or production in ANY way. This review was NOT written in full, or in part, by a bot. I am just an honest viewer, who wishes for more straight forward reviews (less trolls and fanboys), and better entertainment. Hope I helped you out.